|
|
Research on Assembly Technology of High-Pressure Compressor Rotor Based on Concentricity Optimization |
LI Pengfei, JIN Bin, FENG Shaobao, ZHANG Taotao, ZU Jianguo |
AECC Shenyang Aero Engine Research Institute, Shenyang 110015, China |
|
|
Abstract In order to improve the concentricity level and stability of concentricity measurement results after the assembly of high pressure compressor rotors in aircraft engines, as well as the accuracy of predicting results during the assembly process, research has been conducted on issues such as the inability to optimize the perpendicularity of the rear end face of the components and poor repeatability of concentricity measurement results during the assembly of compressor rotors. By establishing the calculation model of the eccentricity of the middle section of the core machine rotor, found that the influence of the perpendicularity error of the back end face of the compressor rotor on the eccentricity of the middle section of the core machine rotor was 3.4 times that of the concentricity error. By establishing the datum correction model of the concentricity measurement process of the compressor rotor, it is analyzed that the reasons for the poor repeatability of the measurement results and the poor accuracy of prediction results are that the ratio of the rotor height to the radius of the reference end face is large, which makes the corrected results highly sensitive to the slight differences in the fitting surfaces of the reference end faces of the front shaft at different radial positions. Therefore, by reducing the ratio of the rotor height to the radius of the reference end face, taking the back end face as the measurement datum and improving the stack assembly direction, not only could the stability of the rotor concentricity measurement results be improved, but also the influence of the perpendicularity of the back end face could be considered in the stack optimization process. The verification results show that the concentricity error of the rotor is reduced by 68%, and the repeatability error of the measurement results decreases from 32% to 13%.
|
|
|
PACS: V263.2+2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|