=0.1 mm/z)条件下,切削距离达2100 mm 时,PCD 刀具的磨损量显著低于PCBN 刀具,其抗磨损能力提高了61.80%。PCBN 刀具以磨粒磨损和随机脆性剥落为主,伴随扩散磨损,而PCD 刀具以黏结磨损和均匀微崩为主,磨粒磨损程度较轻。本研究为优化SiC
p
/Al 复合材料的高效精密加工工艺提供了理论和实践依据。
Abstract
Aluminum matrix composites (SiC
p
/Al) exhibit superior specific strength
excellent wear resistance
good thermal stability
and tunable properties
and thus have become key structural materials in high-tech fields including aerospace and rail transit. However
the presence of high-hardness particle reinforcement phases poses severe challenges to machining tools. Aiming at the demand for efficient machining of SiC
p
/Al composites
this study systematically compared the performance differences between two superhard tools (PCD and PCBN) un
der varying cutting parameters by dynamically monitoring process parameters (e.g.
cutting force and cutting temperature) and conducting correlation analysis of tool life and wear morphology
the cutting stability and failure mechanisms of the two tool types were comprehensively evaluated. The results show that PCD tools yield lower cutting forces and temperatures under different cutting speeds and high feed conditions due to their high thermal conductivity and low friction characteristics; Under the high-efficiency cutting process parameters (cutting speed v
c
= 250 m/min
feed per tooth f
z
= 0.1 mm/z)
when the cutting distance reaches 2100 mm
the wear amount of the PCD tool is significantly lower than that of the PCBN tool
and its wear resistance is relatively improved by 61.80%. The dominant wear mechanisms differ between the two: PCBN tools are dominated by abrasive wear
random brittle spalling and diffusion wear
while PCD tools are characterized by adhesive wear and uniform micro-chipping with less severe abrasive wear. This study provides a theoretical and practical basis for optimizing the efficient and precision machining processes of SiC